Experts: Danish authorities overlook the extreme right

topelement

 

The fight against right-wing extremism in Denmark is overlooked because politicians and authorities are constantly talking about Islamic extremism.

By Ritzau / Radio24syv – 08 / 08-16

A number of researchers and professionals with insight into extremism to Radio 24syv after a summer in which Europe has been hit by militant extremist terror, but also the Labour politician Jo Cox was murdered by a man with neo-Nazi connections as well as where nine people in München -Germany lost their lives at the hands of a Anders Breivik-inspired 18-year-old man.

- I think the authorities overlook the extreme right, and the phenomenon of Islamist extremism is exaggerated and overstated the threat, says Associate Professor at the University of Southern Kirstine Sinclair, who has researched Islamism.

Same notes sound from social-anthropologist Tina Wilchen Christensen, who has researched radicalization.

( The Swastika photo caption say; Denmark for Danes)

The latest case of Islamophobic vandalism in Denmark

Fuck Islam 2 School Entrance Turkish School

Police says that it is looking seriously at boarding school vandalism

Næstved – August 13, 2016

South Zealand and Lolland-Falster police has received a notification about a vandalism committed against Mina Hindholm School in Fuglebjerg. Vandalism consists of several written word that has a content that is racist.

With spray paint, there are several places on the school walls, woodwork and windows written ‘Fuck Islam “and” Islam out of Denmark ”

– It is still too early to conclude anything about perpetrators, however, we have launched a targeted investigation in the case. We are looking very seriously at this type of crime, and we will be very happy to talk to witnesses who may have information about the vandalism, said police inspector Kim Kliver from South Zealand and Lolland-Falster police.

Will Smith Shuts Down Islamophobia And Donald Trump

will-smith-2 476325099-actor-will-smith-attends-the-oscars-held-at-hollywood

“The Middle East can’t allow Fox News to be the arbiter of the imagery.”

08/09/2016
Source: Huffington Post

The actor said that America’s Islamophobia motivated him to attend the event in Dubai. Smith said that he’d been tweeting and sharing pictures to fight the anti-Muslim climate in the U.S, according to the Associated Press.

“The Middle East can’t allow Fox News to be the arbiter of the imagery, you know,” the actor said. “So cinema is a huge way to be able to deliver the truth of the soul of a place to a global audience.”

Smith then voiced his disappointment in the Republican nominee for president, Donald Trump, and his loyal followers. The GOP candidate has repeatedly said he would ban Muslim immigration to the United States.

The actor slammed Trump last week for his hateful treatment of women, calling it “absolute fucking insanity” that the business mogul could get away with his disgusting comments.
“For a man to be able to publicly refer to a woman as a fat pig, that makes me teary,” Smith said in an interview with Australian news websitenews.com.au.

We couldn’t agree more.

Differences between Danes and immigrants is blown out of proportion

 

http://politiken.dk/debat/ECE3236949/forskelle-mellem-danskere-og-nydanskere-blaeses-ud-af-proportioner/#tocomment

Politiken JUNE 3. 2016

Hjarn v. Zernichow Borberg (51 years) is a graduate in economics. He is an external lecturer at the Department of Economics at the University of Copenhagen and section chief in the Capital Region. He has previously worked for the Danish Bank, Ministry of Education, the Council of Ministers and the Danish Immigration Service. He has recently written the book; ‘New Danes”  and asked; Are immigrants and Danes really so different?’.

The economist and former employee of the Immigration Hjarn v. Zernichow Borberg, in this interview, says that the debate is a false narrative about immigrants and Danes and immigrants are not so different. Actually he reminds us that in nine out of ten cases, we are similar to each other.  In this book, he presents his statistics on the subject, hoping to get balance into the debate.

The figures are a selection of the numbers that Hjarn v. Zernichow Borberg presents in his new book ‘ethnic Danes – Are immigrants and Danes really so different?’ Several figures are approximate figures. They are taken from a variety of statistics, studies, etc.

“If you only know immigrants from media headlines and public debate, you get a wrong impression of reality, because here all the time media is focusing on the differences. The stories are viewed in isolation, rarely double checked and the numbers are not put into perspective, and overall, the many stories about the differences create a false story about the new Danes. Eventually I have to write a book where I could put the overall statistical picture forward.

The book covers the concept of immigrants than immigrants and descendants from non-Western countries: people who are often looked at in immigration debate here at home.

“The media presents a picture of the immigrants that they huddle together in Ghettos, do not want to work and are more criminal than Danes. The fact is that immigrants do not live in ‘ghettos’ – like the Danes do not. Only 10 percent of the new Danes live there. About 97 percent of new immigrants are not criminals – the figure for Danes is only slightly higher. Immigrants have a lower employment rate than the Danes, but there is a large, large majority of well-integrated immigrant people who want to be part of Danish society “.

Hjarn v. Zernichow Borberg pulls two pieces of white paper and begins to draw: “You can illustrate it very simple. The one piece of paper is about immigrants or new Danes and the other one of Danes. We draw a dot on both papers. One dot – representing immigrants – is slightly larger than the one on the Danes. My point is simply: What about everything else? Do you only see the dot, or you see the entire piece of paper? The 90-  95 percent of us are similar but when you draw a picture with a wide brush, the differences are blown up. ”

97.3 percent are not criminals

The book ‘ethnic Danes’ is filled with numbers in areas such as ‘Cohabitation and relationships’, ‘Home and residence’, ‘School and Education’, ‘Health & Fitness’, ‘Democracy and citizenship’ and ‘Equality and Gender’.

Perhaps it will surprise anyone that immigrant women get more abortions than Danish women. The divorce rate among immigrants is higher than among Danes. And those who believe that all non-Western immigrants have a medieval approach to sex, you might wonder that 97 percent said they are comfortable with female bosses at work. Participation in cultural and leisure activities is high for both Danes and Danes, and the vast majority of young immigrants – about 78 percent – are in employment, education or training. For young Danes, the figure is about 86 percent. Hjarn Borberg comes with several examples of what he believes is erroneous images.

“I’ve gone and collected all this data for many years, because both in my work within government and elsewhere, I saw an entirely different picture. That nuanced image, I think is important to be visible. There are differences, and there are problems, but there must also be proportions. It is the latter, I try to contribute with in the debate. ”

 Can you give an example?

‘Let us take the crime and put the Danes at index 100, then you automatically get that for immigrants perhaps Index 250, and then the story runs, but nobody mentions that only 2.7 percent of immigrants are criminals. When you turn the figure around, you will see 97.3 percent immigrants, who have not even hurt a cat and 99.1 per cent Danes have the same situation. So what is really the great difference between us? ”

 But surely it is important to talk about the things that do not work? If we just look at the people who do not have problems, we can overlook the problems?

“Yes, and I did not write at one place in the book that this or that story should not have been written. I’m just saying that there is something called relative terms (eg. ratio in pct.) and actual figures and then I note how many, we talking about when we talk about this group. I have nothing against the debate ‘.

 Distorted debate

»The Monday Morning weekly for example, had a headline that the number of invalid pensioners among immigrants had ‘exploded’. But the proportion is the same as it has always been but just more immigrants are now in this age where every onecan get disability benefits. The figure is slightly higher among immigrants than Danes. But if you just see the headline, you think that they have changed their behavior. This is not true. The fact is that there are more elderly immigrants’.

 Some will say that this is just a politically correct input, and that you put a damper on the real problems. We hear, for example, that women’s shelters are filled with women of other ethnic background than Danish. What do you think?

“If you only think that you can determine whether there is violence or non – violence against women in Denmark, based on looking at the statistics for women shelters, then you are totally wrong. The large number is actually among Danish women. It’s a fact that there are so many women who ask for help, but can not get it because there are limitations on how much help the women can get because of the limited number of shelters for women. When there are so few seats, the shelters prioritize those who do not have a network to go to, namely immigrant women. And if you are making analysis from emergency hospital reports, you can see that Danish women are just as hard hit – or as little – as immigrant women.”

 So Danish women come in the back of the line due to immigrant women?

“Many Danish women have fortunately a network, which means that they can get help elsewhere. It is a good example of how bad an analysis can go if you think that all these people coming from outside Denmark beat their wives, and therefore, the centers are filled up. ”

 Zoom in technique

Here is an article from Ekstra Bladet: “New immigrant statistic: Every fourth immigrant breaks the law – immigrants from the Middle East and Africa are the most criminal.” It quotes a report from Statistics Denmark, which shows that 27 percent of male descendants from a non-Western country from age 20 to 24 is guilty of an offense. Do you still claim that immigrants are no more criminal than Danes?

“There is no doubt that they have higher numbers, but this type of story is about isolated small pockets, and focusing on the dot instead of the entire paper. It is fine but one should of course start by writing how many immigrants are in the statistics. When the article writes “found guilty of an offense”, it is means all type of offenses – that inclused also the Road Traffic Act – driving too fast and crossing the red light. I pull such offences out of my statistics. I think that Gun law, drugs and criminal offense is the core when we should talk about crimes. The second point to look at is; Who is the victim? The victims of the new Danes’ crime are other immigrants and Danes are victims of the Danes. It is groups that attack groups. This does not mean that I legitimize the crime. It just means that you try to blow up a number and create fear. The Danes also think that there is more crime in society than there actually is. ”

 You say that this type of stories actually involves a small group?

“Yes. When newspaper choose to focus on 20-24 year group, it does to confirm their own prejudices, because that’s the age group that is most criminal’.

 How many are we talking about in this group?

“The whole group of the 20-24-year-old descendant men are perhaps 8,000 people. Out of that, a quarter of them – perhaps 2,000 are involved in lawlessness. But what is lawlessness here? At least 60 percent will be traffic offenses. Then we are further down, closer to the approximately 10 per cent of the male population aged 20-24 descendants who are criminals, but they represent only about 0.2 percent of all new Danes. First the newspaper uses the term immigrants in the headline but then it says, descendants in the introduction. There is a big difference. They use the zoom on technique focusing on a very small group in the group, but makes it sound as if it basically is out of the whole group of immigrants. When people then get past the headline; ‘every fourth immigrant is lawless’, they believe that the figure represent quarter of all immigrants. In reality, it is one-fourth of a very narrow group ‘.

Rockwool Foundation has also done a lot of work in this area. Here is a report which shows that 50 percent more non-western descendants are convicted of crime compared to individuals with Danish background …

“How many Danes are criminals? It’s not very many. It is like nothing multiplied by, for example. 150 percent? When you go in and look at these things about crime, one number is larger than the other. There is no reason to hide. I focus just on the majority of both immigrants and Danes. Take another example: It’s hard to bring migrants into volunteering. Yes, but for heavens sake, how many Danes want to do volunteer work? Or take the story of immigrant children dropping breakfast. Yes, it is true that there are slightly more immigrants than Danes who drop the breakfast, but nobody knows that there are approximately 65,000 Danish children who apparently go to school without breakfast. So let us focus on the problem for all children ‘.

The majority are the role models

Is there not statistics, where you can actually see a difference that worry you?

“Yes. One is homofobi where there is a difference. It is not because the new Danes say that homosexuality should be banned, but a significant minority have a problem with it. We must also work with the voting turnout, which in my view is the lifeblood of a good Democrat. In addition, immigrants have made abortion more than Danes. Maybe we should provide several of these female immigrants, sex education (not their children, but immigrant women). And finally, I wish if you could get employment higher up and get more immigrants to join the labor market ‘.

 Speaking of employment. Looking at the figures here, there is a fairly large difference in employment. The employment rate for immigrants is significantly lower than for Danes?

“Yes. What you just need to know is that there are more immigrants who are self-supporting. And I just can count on me to, if you compare, there are about 5 percentage points, which can be explained in changing immigration patterns. You have a number of employed and takes a given group 16-64 years who are immigrants. There are also many people coming to Denmark to study or to work. Those who come to work, taking with them perhaps a spouse. He pulls up the employed number, the spouse pulls it down. Students, au pairs, volunteers and interns also draws the employment level down. You compare apples and pears when comparing employment rates between Danes and immigrants because of the changed pattern. You’re not getting me to argue that people should not work. What I am simply saying is that you should investigate deeper what the numbers represent. ”

 Hjarn_1032713v 97_ikke kriminel jpg bobler_1_1032741yYou say there is a false narrative. What do you think are the consequences?

“The fact is that we have a debate form and approach to other people, which is characterized by mistrust. Those who know a functioning new Dane, may be thinking: Here’s a role model. But it is a lie; not because people do not have to be role models, but because the majority of are role models! The majority are well-adjusted – even those who do not speak perfect Danish ‘.

DANSK POLITIK 2015

Det hævdes ofte af anti-mindretalS kræfter i Danmark, at indvandrere, flygtninge og asylansøgere ikke er til gavn for dansk økonomi.

Sådanne uvidende mennesker bør lytte til deres egne landsmænd, både fagforeninger og arbejdsgiverorganisationer. De skriger efter en bedre måde at inkludere disse grupper på arbejdsmarkedet, men nationalistiske politikere ville ikke lytte. Hvorfor, fordi de ikke ønsker, at disse mennesker skal være i Danmark.

  1. FTF: Arbejdsparate flygtninge drukner i papirbunker

FTF håber, at regeringens udlændingeudspil vil sende flere flygtninge ud på arbejdsmarkedet.

  1. Topchef kritiserer politisk nøleri om integrationsregler

Danfoss’ formand mener, at flygtninge- og asylreglerne skal ændres. Systemet er for strengt, mener han.

OK-Jørgen-Mads-Clausen

http://jyllands-posten.dk/politik/ECE8105571/Topchef-kritiserer-politisk-n%F8leri-om-integrationsregler/

 

 

Dansk Folkepartis byrådsmedlem Mogens Camre er dømt for racisme ved retten i Glostrup

Det var racisme, da Dansk Folkepartis byrådsmedlem Mogens Camre forrige sommer røg til tasterne på Twitter for at skrive om muslimer og nazisme.

Det har retten i Glostrup her til formiddag slået fast og dømt politikeren 8.000 kroner i bøde.
Mogens Camre var tiltalt efter straffelovens racismeparagraf, efter at han den 24. juli 2014 om aftenen skrev en opdatering på Twitter med ordlyden:
– Om Jødernes situation i Europa: Muslimerne fortsætter, hvor Hitler sluttede. Kun den behandling, Hitler fik, vil ændre situationen.

9c7f5686-2a37-41fe-a362-f1449b60c8f5_5ad10e1b143c49d6a0b21981561907af

http://www.dr.dk/…/p…/mogens-camre-doemt-racisme-paa-twitter

 

Understanding Muslim minorities today!

My good friend Professor Tahir Abbas delivered a great lecture at Fatih University in Istanbul – Turkey on 13 May 2013.

In his presentation, he talked about Muslim minority issues in Britain and in Western Europe, and how notions of identity are shaped by immigration history, memory, politics, patterns of racism, integration and assimilation, and the role of policy.

He stated the importance of Muslims finding the middle path as a way forward, one that balances the best of all intellectual, cultural and spiritual worlds, and to look beyond the horizons to achieve that poise and harmony.

His thoughts are very much in line with the vast majority of Muslim communities in the Western world.

Thanks Tahir for this excellent presentation.

Minoriteternes Grundlovsdag 2014 på Christiania

Large gathering Herr. Bonnichsen 2

Minoriteterne er majoriteten!!!

Gennem årene har jeg hvert år oplevet, at der fejres Grundlovsdag med politiske taler rundt om i landet. Ledende politikere har – via deres respektive organisationer – foretrukne steder, hvor de traditionelt afleverer deres budskaber, der både handler om demokratiets principper og om aktuelle politiske problemstillinger. 5. juni får alle danske politikere – store som små – en chance for at sige, hvad deres vision for Danmark er.

Som politisk aktiv person elsker jeg gode taler, specielt når de kommer fra karismatiske og inspirerende ledere.

I år var jeg i Christiania for at lytte til en vidunderlig dansker, Hans Jørgen Bonnichsen, fhv. operativ chef for PET og debattør. Hans tale hed: 
‘Når Råbene bliver Høje’. Han var hovedtaler ved 5. juni-festlighederne. På Christiania afvikles Grundlovsdag i samarbejde mellem Christianias Kulturforening og forskellige repræsentanter for minoritetsgrupper, i de sidste par år især sammen med Landsforeningen Lediges Vilkår.

De mener, at Grundlovsdag handler om Grundloven:
- om demokrati og menneskerettigheder
- om de grupper det går ud over, når Grundloven tilsidesættes. Minoriteternes Grundlovsdag har alle årene haft fokus på menneskerettighederne, som de er tænkt ind i den danske grundlov, og som de misligeholdes i den virkelige verden.

Jeg har stor respekt for Hans Jørgen Bonnichsens humanisme og kamp for menneskerettigheder for alle, og hans budskab var klart. ”Grundloven hviler på værdier, som vi holder meget af. Den sikrer vores demokrati, vores frihedsrettigheder og vores retssikkerhed. Den giver os kort sagt et Danmark, der er et trygt hjem for os alle – arbejdsløse, arabere, bøsser, christianitter, ensomme, flexjobbere, flygtninge m.fl.”

Om aftenen hørte jeg taler af de 3 vigtigste danske politiske personligheder: Helle Thorning-Schmidt, Lars Løkke Rasmussen og Kristian Thulesen Dahl.

Fr. Thorning-Schmidt talte om EU og Danmark, Slaget om Normandiet og D-dag, 70 år tilbage, og det danske demokrati som et godt eksempel for andre.

Hr. Rasmussen talte om sine politiske vanskeligheder, mediernes manipulation af hans bilagssag, dansk demokrati og rullepølse.

Hr. Thulesen Dahl talte i bidende og aggressiv tone og angreb non-stop statsministeren og hendes parti.

I sammenligning med hr. Bonnichsen lød det til, at disse 3 danske politikere ganske glemte at tale om det gavnlige, det inklusive og det opløftende.

Negative views on Muslims in EU

 

Muslims-negative-views-in-EU

30th May 2014

Many people in the seven European Union nations surveyed express negative views about minority groups in their country, according to Pew Research published on May 12. In particular, negative attitudes toward Roma (sometimes also known as Gypsies) are common, while many also give Muslims unfavorable ratings. Negative attitudes toward Jews are less pervasive. Negative sentiments about all three groups are consistently more common among people on the ideological right.

At least half of those surveyed in Italy, Greece and Poland say they have a negative opinion of the Muslims who live in their country. Public opinion is divided on this question in Spain, while in Germany and the UK a majority says they have positive views of Muslims. The most favourable ratings are registered in France (72% favourable), which among the seven nations surveyed has the highest percentage of Muslims in the national population.

As is the case with attitudes toward Roma, views about Muslims are tied to ideology. While 47% of Germans on the political right give Muslims an unfavourable rating, just 20% on the left do so. The gap between left and right is also more than 20 percentage points in France, Italy and Greece. And significant differences are found in Spain and the UK as well.

Attitudes are also linked to age, with negative sentiments more pervasive among older respondents. In Spain, about half of those age 50 and older (51%) give Muslims in their country an unfavorable rating; only a third of people under age 30 say the same. Significant differences between people 50 and older and 18- to 29-year-olds are also found in France (a gap of 12 percentage points), Germany (13 points), Italy (12 points) and the UK (9 points).

Many people in the seven European Union nations surveyed express negative views about minority groups in their country, according to Pew Research published on May 12. In particular, negative attitudes toward Roma (sometimes also known as Gypsies) are common, while many also give Muslims unfavourable ratings. Negative attitudes toward Jews are less pervasive. Negative sentiments about all three groups are consistently more common among people on the ideological right.

At least half of those surveyed in Italy, Greece and Poland say they have a negative opinion of the Muslims who live in their country. Public opinion is divided on this question in Spain, while in Germany and the UK a majority says they have positive views of Muslims. The most favourable ratings are registered in France (72% favourable), which among the seven nations surveyed has the highest percentage of Muslims in the national population.

As is the case with attitudes toward Roma, views about Muslims are tied to ideology. While 47% of Germans on the political right give Muslims an unfavourable rating, just 20% on the left do so. The gap between left and right is also more than 20 percentage points in France, Italy and Greece. And significant differences are found in Spain and the UK as well.

Attitudes are also linked to age, with negative sentiments more pervasive among older respondents. In Spain, about half of those age 50 and older (51%) give Muslims in their country an unfavourable rating; only a third of people under age 30 say the same. Significant differences between people 50 and older and 18- to 29-year-olds are also found in France (a gap of 12 percentage points), Germany (13 points), Italy (12 points) and the UK (9 points).

http://www.muslimnews.co.uk/newspaper/islamophobia/negative-views-muslims-eu

European Parliament Elections 2014 resulted in big gains for extreme far right and anti-EU parties

Germany European Elections _74992160_euflagsafp _75099223_75099220 _75099227_75099224

When in the late nineties, I started working as President of ENAR- the European Network Against Racism, I was hopeful that the struggle for human rights, anti-racism, and anti-discrimination would go from strength to strength in the future.

For a while it did go in the right direction but slowly and steadily, anti-migrants, anti-asylum and religious discrimination started taking hold. More and more political movements and parties started using propaganda tools against ethnic and religious minorities and the atmosphere became poisonous.

Progressive people and NGOs warned the European and national decision makers that something was going wrong. Unfortunately, the mainstream parties were afraid to be seen by public as listening to anti-racist worries.

The 2014 EU Parliament election of today has proven us right. In most EU countries from Finland to Greece and UK to Hungry, far right parties have won more than 25% votes.

For example, in UK, UKIP got 30%, in Denmark, DPP got 27%, and in France, Front National received 26% votes. In Germany, even a New Nazi candidate was elected.

The far right-wing populist and anti-Islam Danish People’s Party won the largest share of Danish votes, 26.7%, party’s best-ever European showing.

Of the Front National’s victory in France, Martin Schulz, the former Socialist president of the European Parliament said: “It’s a bad day for the European Union, when a party with a racist, xenophobic and anti-Semitic program gets 25% of the vote.”

Mr. Schulz should have added anti-Islam and anti-Arab to this racist party’s titles.

This tilt to the far right will effect the national elections in many EU countries and will hugely influence the mainstream parties and would force these to make compromises on humanistic policies.

It is a sad day for democracy in Europe, because it is now firmly marching in the wrong direction.